نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیارگروه فلسفه دین، پژوهشکده فلسفه، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
"Scientific criticism" is the analysis and evaluation of the merits and shortcomings of a scientific work, and based on this, in the upcoming article, we will discuss the scientific criticism of the "judgmental model of Islamic social sciences" and the evaluation of its merits and shortcomings. Things like: attention to theorizing, attention to the issue of religious science, multiplication in the Sadra'i philosophical tradition and ijtihad tradition, attention to methodological aspects, attention to theorizing and updating the model are mentioned under the strengths and also the weaknesses to two The categories of structural and content weaknesses are divided such as: lack of comprehensive definition and demarcation of concepts, lack of systematization of model ratio with classification of sciences, structural jumps, the way social sciences are perceived, conceptual confusion, criteria of epistemological theory, and methodological issues. In this research, we used the analytical-critical method and finally it was emphasized that methodical (methodological) criticisms are always ahead of content criticisms because they talk about how the scientific structure of a research is formed and until a methodical framework is set, there is no way It will not be open to the entry of a scientific thought, point of view, or theory.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)